The digital revolution happening in the legal world translates to the rise of many legal-tech startups. During the Covid-19 pandemic, the need for digital services in the legal sector increased dramatically, especially with regard to litigation – the ultimate ‘face-to-face’ fight (literally) – which was forced to be limited during the lockdown and social distancing.
Legal Technology Trends 2022: Digital Courts by Maya Ashkenazi
Many countries thought creatively about how to conduct the different legal processes and therefore allowed the establishment of digital courts. The rise of the digital court’s trend was accelerated by the pandemic, but it has been on the legal tech startup’s agenda for quite some time now.
For example, the issue was discussed in China back in 2017, before we even imagined a global pandemic.
Various forms of digital courts.
Before we get into specifics, we need to understand the various forms of digital courts.
- The first is the kind that still makes us move uncomfortably in our chairs – courts with AI (artificial intelligence) based judges. In those courts, all the litigation process – from evidence exchange to closing argument – is aimed to be operated through an app.
- The second kind is what we witness more and more during Covid-19 – regular court debates which are operated through video conference apps such as Zoom or Slack. The judges are the same ones we know from the actual physical courthouse.
Originally, there was a wide-range discussion about the digitalization of court proceedings, but not necessarily about the hearing itself.
E-discovery (electronic exchange of information alongside a civil dispute resolution case) was one of the initial legal tech ideas to make the process more time effective and efficient.
Covid-19 and its implications forced us to take one step forward – and focus on virtual courtrooms. Among the countries that adopted digital courts during the lockdown, we witnessed the UK, Brazil, India, Singapore, and many more.
Even the Supreme Court of the United States had conducted phone hearings recently, and the European Court of Justice allowed those who cannot make it to the court – to join online and present their argument – which is something that was never allowed before.
Israel legal technology trends: Digital courts
In Israel a lawsuit was recently filed, asking to establish digital courts in order to give those who are in quarantine their right to face a judge if needed. An emphasis for the magnitude of this trend can be seen in an article recently posted on “Michigan Lawyers Weekly” which mentioned that courts in Michigan State in the US have exceeded 500,000 hours (!) of Zoom hearings.
The benefits to the establishment of virtual courtrooms
There are some benefits to the establishment of virtual courtrooms. First, it allows processes to be conducted during Covid-19. Countries feared there would be severe implications to postponing hearings until after the pandemic fades. This would have imposed high costs on the judicial system, overload of court proceedings, and eventually – limited access to justice.
By allowing digital litigation, a wide range of cases could be heard on time, among them urgent matters.
Second, even if markets start to open up in certain countries, and so do courts – there are people that still cannot physically arrive to court. For example, people that are more at risk during this time (older people, etc) or even those who are in quarantine.
The problems arising from these digital proceedings
However, we cannot ignore the problems arising from these digital proceedings. Court proceedings are done through commonly used video-conferences apps such as Zoom. By using software that is not designated for this specific cause, security and privacy concerns must be considered.
Perhaps the type of the proceeding should be limited – some people claim that only civilian cases can be permitted online, while criminal cases that handle more sensitive issues be on face to face basis.
This May, a man has given a death sentence in Singapore via Zoom – this emphasizes the complexity and raises many questions and emotions. Except for privacy concerns which can be solved one day by legal tech startups offering designated software for virtual courts – or other protections to the existing video-conference apps – emotions cannot be “solved” using tech.
Due to this fact, countries decided to postpone hearings that handle more sensitive litigation since it is harder to express it via video call. Many times, the defense is using the emotions as a litigation strategy, and we can only wonder what the outcome of the death sentence was if it was in a real courthouse.
China’s legal technology trends and digital courts.
In China, there are two different versions of the more so-called “advanced” kind of digital court: Last year, the Chinese social media giant WeChat established a “MobileCourt”. In this court, verdicts are given by AI-based judges (presented by judicial avatar) and delivered through the app.
Also, the case filings, evidence exchange can be done through the app. Furthermore, back in 2017 the first “Cybercourt” was introduced in Hangzhou, China. This court is focused on copyright and e-commerce claims.
Even though the platforms’ litigation is handled by an avatar judge, both are supervised by real judges. This is more efficient because it allows them to focus solely on the decision, while the rest of the process is much faster.
Of course, this sounds very futuristic and brings many complexities and ethical discussions, but for now, this model works and expands throughout China.
Legal technology trends in digital courts are rising.
To conclude, the legal trend of digital courts is rising. Many countries keep getting on board and using virtual courts to make the “new normal” that we are experiencing as normal as possible. Other countries – starting with China – are already one step ahead with this trend, and only time will tell when the rest of the world catches up.
It is important to remember that, like in any adoption of technology, there are many benefits – alongside some well-known downsides, but even partial acceptance – is a great start.
About Article’s Author: Maya Ashkenazi
Maya Ashkenazi is a Legal Marketing Consultant at the Robus consulting group, and a Legal Tech analyst at Tech&Law an Israeli legal tech platform.
You may also be interested in other Maya Ashkenazi articles about Legal Technology Trends:
Or Legal Tech for Startups at the Startup Nation.
High-Tech Magazine: Stay updated
If you are interested in discovering more high-tech tips, check out our High-Tech Online Magazine. If you would like to be included in an article or in our High-Tech Magazine, contact us via our Social Networks.